Posts Tagged ‘reporting’

China Dialogue has published a green guide to China’s new 5 year plan.

The 5 year plan will focus on issues such as pollution reduction, energy efficiency, large scale recycling and a more reliable and cleaner energy supply.

The environmental market is predicted at growing by 15% to 20% annually.

China’s aim at producing 15% of its energy from non-fossil fuels, from 8.3% in 2009.

The new energy industry development plan commits from £190b to £280b in renewable energy over 10 years.

In terms of energy efficiency, China will target a reduction of energy intensity of 16%, mainly focusing on heavy industry, construction and transportation.

National demand-side management will also be established as well as using public procurement to purchase products with energy saving labels.

China has pledge to reduce carbon intensity (carbon by unit of GDP) by 17% by 2017 and by 40% to 45% by 2020.

This will include piloting a carbon trading scheme, low carbon cities and provinces and a rise in forest coverage of 22%.

What is the current percentage of renewable energy in Europe?

How will each of the member states will comply with the 20% target by 2020?

What is the growth of photovoltaics in Spain? How the UK will jump from a shameful 2.2% in 2008 to a 15% in 2020?

Did you know that Sweden with 44% is the country with the highest proportion of renewables?

What is the estimated additional installed capacity in each country?

Which percentage on-shore wind, off-shore, concentrated solar, biomas, photovoltaics, geothermal?

These are just some of the facts and figures that you can find in the great summary report prepared by ENDS Europe.

Click here to see the full report.

ENDS Europe

On Wednesday I heard Friedrich Hinterberger from SERI speak. He had 54 slides with lots of world sustainability figures but one that got my attention was the net importers and exporters of carbon.

It shows clearly how the West is importing carbon emissions from countries like China. Most of these emissions relate to the embodied impact of raw materials that go into products. For example, around 70% of the LCA impact of a carpet tile is in the raw materials. This is more or less similar in most physical products.

So what is the best way cut carbon emissions in China then? No, it’s not transferring renewable technology there. It’s redesigning the products that we design in the West so that they have much less embodied carbon (for example by using raw materials less carbon intensive).

And is this difficult or costly? No, it’s not. The actual bottleneck is that people don’t bother to do the maths and use LCA.

Download the full deck from Friedrich here

defraEarlier this week, the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra to you and me) joined the Department of Energy and Climate Change and the Home Office in publishing real-time energy consumption data online. If you go to this page on their web site   you can see a graph spiking up and down showing energy units used per hour and use over the past 24 hours at its main London headquarters building. It is also clever enough to disclose the energy cost per hour and carbon emissions.

Whether this is simply a gimmick or real progress towards full transparency – I think it is certainly a good start. The government has committed to cutting carbon emissions across all central departments by 10% by next May, so it will be interesting to what Defra does next (and which departments follow suit). It has already promised that as more data is collected, it will publish results for different time periods (use per week, month and year).

So, Defra is definitely making a move in the right direction, but it needs to look at more than just energy consumption. Real carbon transparency will depend on reporting total carbon emissions during the whole life cycle of a building – including the energy used to produce building materials and furniture (and carpet!). Also, it’s not just carbon emissions that have a negative impact on the environment. Hopefully, one day in the not too distant future, government departments will also report on waste production and water usage in a similar way.

In my opinion, the best way for the Government (or any organisation for that matter) to get reliable and validated information on its full environmental impact, including carbon emissions is to use Environmental Product Declarations  and continue to provide just the facts.

Did you catch the latest research on sustainability and business from 02 and The Future Laboratory?  It’s called “Harnessing Change: Preparing for Business in the Next Decade” – you can take a look here.

 The Independent wrote about it over the weekend so I was keen to take a look for myself.  It certainly makes a number of interesting points but, I’m sorry to say, also contains the dreaded ‘fluff’.

According to the findings, almost half of UK businesses plan to invest up to 50 per cent more to make their organisations more sustainable over the next decade.  Fantastic, yes?  Well, it definitely sounds impressive.  But what exactly are they aiming to achieve with this extra investment?  How much more is ‘more sustainable’?  Are we talking a little bit more – or a whole lot more?  It is all too easy for an organisation to make a commitment to be more sustainable, but without quantifying the improvement to be made it is, in my view, an empty promise.  Kind of ironic given that the report author says this is precisely what will come under fire from legislators and consumers in the future!  I want to see facts and figures – a commitment to reducing carbon emissions by X per cent.  Something tangible.

I think the report falls down by not asking respondents more specifically about their sustainability targets over the next ten years.  However, what it does do (and rather well) is set out what it calls a ‘sustainable path to profit’.  This makes a lot of sense to me and resonates with what we as a business are already doing and seeing results from.

1).        Investment in innovation

I couldn’t agree more.  At InterfaceFLOR sustainable innovation has led to our two best-selling products.  These account for 11 per cent and 14 per cent of our European sales respectively.

2).        Driving internal advocacy to think long-term

Absolutely!  The progress we have made to date just wouldn’t have been possible without the right training programmes and the right culture of sustainability.  We have created a culture of contagious optimism, where everyone across all functions of the business contributes to sustainability and achieving our long-term Mission Zero goal.

3).        Investment in new technology

Yes!  New technology is the key to disrupting and entering new markets, creating new business opportunities.  In the case of InterfaceFLOR, technology innovations such as our Cool Green machine  – which enables us to recycle waste from the manufacturing process back in to our products – have helped us improve the sustainability of our products.

4).        Forging stronger ties with local communities

I concur that collaboration with third parties will generate new solutions to sustainability.  But not just with the general public as identified in the report – also with customers, suppliers, entrepreneurs, innovators, universities, etc.  Let’s face it, not all the smartest guys on the planet work for you so it’s important to spread your net.

5).        Lobbying for more rules and guidance from government

In my view, any business genuinely committed to sustainability will be lobbying in the future (hopefully more than the 30 per cent of survey respondents who say they intend to do so!).  Take a look at InterfaceFLOR’s own lobbying efforts here http://tiny.cc/zocx7

With increasing transparency, hiding behind NGOs (which 20 per cent of businesses say they will set up) just won’t be an option.

So, those are my thoughts.  What do you think?  Have you started down the sustainable path to profit – and what has your experience been?

What a remarkable thing is wikileaks! I’m still trying to understand the power of transparency and whistleblowing. What Wikileaks does is taking transparency to the maximum, that’s why is so powerful. Well, it’s involuntary transparency, which makes it even more interesting.

Instead of the typical boring CSR report, 3-times distilled like these new vodkas, by the usual Corporate Affairs directors and the lawyers, can you imagine how great would be to read the drafts with the tracked changes? That would give you much more information on the performance and policy of a company that the final polished report. And what about reading the drafts of the assurance statements? That would be at least more fun than reading the normal ones…

Maybe one day we’re lucky and wikileaks get this stuff from a big company…

www.wikileaks.org