Posts Tagged ‘Environmental Product Declaration’

Defra has launched a consultation on GHG emissions reporting by UK companies (See here consultation document).A number of businesses, led by The Aldersgate Group believe the Government must introduce regulations for all large businesses to report their carbon emissions (Click here for the full press release).

My view is that carbon reporting should be mandatory for large companies. Big business come with big responsibilities and they need to help society to deal with climate change. Reducing absolute emmisions should be scrutinised publicly and this process starts wiht mandatory reporting.

But if we want to get businesses to come up with real solutions we need to make mandatory to report at product level. Most of the impacts of companies are outside their boundaries, either in their supply chains or customers. What’s the point of a car company reporting their corporate emissions? They should focus on the car emissions, which is several times bigger. Same for many physical products like a carpet tile, where around 70% of the impact is embodied in the raw materials.

So mandatory corporate reporting is good but mandatory EPDs (product reporting) would be even better….

Nice report from the UK department of business and skills (BIS) on the impact of the carbon impact of the construction industry, which is only 1% direct but mostly on the use (83%) and manufacturing of materials (15%).

The fact that in the UK the use phase is still so high compared to countries such as Germany is due to the very poor energy performance building standards in the UK.

Regarding the impacts of manufacturing, EPDs needs to be must now to show transparent performance from different products and encourage competition. At least it should be mandatory to products that account for most of the embedded CO2 such as structural clay products or cement.

View the complete report here

Come visit  our stand (number N630) at Ecobuild and get your anti-greenwash badge which says ‘Cut the Fluff and send me an EPD’.

This Thursday I will be speaking about Green PR and advertising in Moscow.

Yes, Russian companies have woken up to the marvels of green marketing and I will be talking about EPD and our just the facts approach.

The event is organised by the Russian Green Building Council.
Find out more about this event here


My view on DEFRA’s guidance

February 4th, 2011

Some have asked what my opinion is on the DEFRA’s guidance on green claims. I think it is a very well crafted document with clear guidance.

I specially like part 3: HOW TO MAKE A GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIM.

The check list makes the right points. How many companies make claims of insignficant issues while not talking about the big issues. For example, recycled or reduced packaging claims which many times refer to a tiny fraction of the overall product impact while embodied impact of raw materials or the use phase is the real issue.

I am very dissapointed that DEFRA does not push for EPDs as the way for backing claims. The report talks that claims need to be relevant to main impacts and clear comparison of performance with others in the market. But the report does not explain that the only way to compare clearly is defining a functional unit, using an agreed Product Category Rule and doing a LCA and third party validated EPD accordingly.

They also talk of scope and boundaries and truthful and accurate representation of the scale. What better than an EPD for that? Why leaving room for companies to tweack the LCA assumptions for supporting claims?

Again, they talk about substantiation and appropriate standards. But no sign of PCRs, functional units and EPDs.

The examples of bad and good practice are brilliant. They summarize the current cheekiness of brands and offer easy examples of how to make right claims. But what can be more substantiation than full product transparency?  i.e. publishing all the EPDS for all your products (showing all the impact categories by life phase, ingredients, etc) Again, no sign of this. Instead they mention irrelevant standards to product claims such as GRI or AA1000, which have corporate scope.

We have produced a RIBA accredited CPD (Continous Proffesional Development) presentation, which can be done both on-line and face to face.

The CPD deals with the issue of transparency and EPDs. The content includes the following topics:

  • Questions environmental claims, labels in the built environment and challenges misconceptions.
  • Explains the importance of using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
  • Provides a check-list for assessing the environmental credentials of a supplier
  • Explains what an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is and its key benefits.

The online CPD lasts just over 30 minutes. At the end of the presentation there is an assessment slide and answers 5 questions, which are randomly selected. If the answers are correct it automatically, we will send a certificate.

Introduction page: http://www.ribaonlinecpd.com/company/03781/home03781.asp

Direct to presentation: http://www.ribaonlinecpd.com/streaming/03781_facts/index.asp

1.Energy efficiency

Companies, countries and society have already figured out that tackling the negawatts is usually the most profitable way of cutting carbon. 2011 will the year where inneficiencies will be tackled in an impressive variety of ways. From companies profiting from selling innovative solutions to consumers, other companies and governments to green deals from governments. Even in Russia where climate change is not a popular topic, energy efficiency is one of the biggest topics for the year.

2. Full transparency will show up the true impacts

After the previous decade, people have had enough of carbon geezing, the term I use to include things such as companies saying they are carbon neutral even if it’s not the point, the abuse of offsets standars, the thousands of magic labels, etc. Full transparency (publishing all the impacts of all the life cycle stages of all your products) will be the only way your customers will trust you.

3. Legislation: leading companies will say ‘bring it on’

Tired of minimum-common-denominator business-association-led type of lobbying and advocacy, leading companies will tell governments yes to smart legislation. Yes, to efficiency standards, to a reasonable carbon price floor and well crafted bans (eg our wish of a ban on carpet landfill). Governments are realizing of how tiring and useless are voluntary agreements if there is no stick or threat attached to it. But smart legislation wont mean going back to the old school green legislation using the environment as an excuse for taxation.

4. The come back of the environmental geek

Companies will start hiring more people with ability to do proper LCAs because they need to understand their impacts at product life cycle level. And they will hire less in green spin doctors because the LCA facts will speak by themselves

InterfaceFLOR at BAU Munich

January 17th, 2011

The BAU exhibition has started in Munich (17th – 22nd January), one of the world’s leading trade fairs in architecture, materials and systems.

We’ve got a cool stand with an almost impossible design (see picture).

At BAU, we are showing how design leadership is compatible with sustainability.  We are also campaigning for full product transparency, the idea of publishing all the environmental information of all the stages of the life cycle of a product, in a third-party validated Environmental Product Declaration (EPD).

Full Product Transparency is here today, beyond the building sector.

Well, not fully in the sense of the whole EPD (Environmental Product Declaration) following a product category rule but certainly a transparency move that not many companies are following yet.

In the following website, you can download an eco-profile for all Nokia’s products and accessories.

For example for the popular high end N95, you get this.

Hopefully the rest of the electronic industry follows and agree product category rules and start publishing proper EPDs for all products.

It’s such a nice surprise to see big consumer product multinationals embracing LCA as a day by day management tool.

Henkel uses a LCA approach and have created a system to rate their own products.

They call it Sustainability#Master. See their presentation here

Unilever has recently committed to halve their environmental impacts of the products measured in full life cycle. See their presentation here

I think the next step for both consumer product companies and retailers should be full product transparency.

They should agree on product category rules and then calculate the impacts according to these product category rules rather than their own systems.

That would allow for  comparability. Then, the next step should be publish Environmental Product Decelerations (EPDs) according to the agreed product category rules.

This is what has happened in the floor industry and our commitment to publish EPDs covering all our products. I believe that next big competition in sustainability will be re-designing products and services to dramatically reduce their impacts.

This will be fuelled by transparent, comparable EPDs.

defraEarlier this week, the UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra to you and me) joined the Department of Energy and Climate Change and the Home Office in publishing real-time energy consumption data online. If you go to this page on their web site   you can see a graph spiking up and down showing energy units used per hour and use over the past 24 hours at its main London headquarters building. It is also clever enough to disclose the energy cost per hour and carbon emissions.

Whether this is simply a gimmick or real progress towards full transparency – I think it is certainly a good start. The government has committed to cutting carbon emissions across all central departments by 10% by next May, so it will be interesting to what Defra does next (and which departments follow suit). It has already promised that as more data is collected, it will publish results for different time periods (use per week, month and year).

So, Defra is definitely making a move in the right direction, but it needs to look at more than just energy consumption. Real carbon transparency will depend on reporting total carbon emissions during the whole life cycle of a building – including the energy used to produce building materials and furniture (and carpet!). Also, it’s not just carbon emissions that have a negative impact on the environment. Hopefully, one day in the not too distant future, government departments will also report on waste production and water usage in a similar way.

In my opinion, the best way for the Government (or any organisation for that matter) to get reliable and validated information on its full environmental impact, including carbon emissions is to use Environmental Product Declarations  and continue to provide just the facts.

 InterfaceFLOR have just won the BITC Environmental Award  in recognition of our approach to climate change:

“InterfaceFLOR demonstrate a holistic and sophisticated approach to climate change which is rooted in a 16-year history of addressing sustainability issues. Groundbreaking product innovation is evident across the business and embedded throughout all operations, with employees at multiple levels fully engaged in ‘Mission Zero’”

Abyd Karmali, Managing Director & Global Head of Carbon Markets Bank of America, Merrill Lynch

 

View InterfaceFLOR’s track record in awards

 
 
 

These are some of the categories to measure environmental impact in an LCA (Life Cycle Assesment) and the units of measurement used.

  1.  Embodied energy  (not renewable Energy from fossil fuels): MJ
  2. Embodied energy (renewable Energy from renewable sources): MJ
  3. Greenhouse potential (emissions that contribute to climate change): kg CO2 equivalent
  4. Acidification potential (emissions that damage vegetation, buildings, aquatic life, and human health): kg SO2 equivalent
  5. Ozone depletion potential (emissions that cause thinning of the earth’s stratospheric ozone layer adversely affecting human health, natural resources and the environment): kg R11 equivalent
  6. Eutrophication potential (emissions that increase the nutrients in water or soil affecting the natural biological balance): kg phosphate equivalent
  7. Photochemical ozone creation potential (emissions of chemicals that cause smog, adversely affecting human health, ecosystems and crops): kg ethene potential
  8. Human toxicity potential (emissions of materials toxic to humans,animals or plants) kg DCB equivalent

More information about LCA and product environmental performance

So how does an EPD look and what does it contain?  It fully discloses all of the ingredients and raw materials. There is no way to hide chemicals or components. It also discloses where the raw materials come from, and of course the full environmental impacts across various categories including all life cycle stages. See an EPD

Environmental Product Declaration